data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60ba7/60ba71b2708f850b4978dd3caedad7e7a7ad2f13" alt="Ublock chrome extension"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4215c/4215c363cce5024ce1b1b0d8ea4f36f1310f10b4" alt="ublock chrome extension ublock chrome extension"
I don't expect Firefox to follow suit and also deprecate its own webRequest API. There are no issue of privacy/performance with uBO, rather the opposite by giving back to users the power of clamping down on what web sites throw at them, so that argument is just plain fallacious as far as uBO is concerned.Ĭhromium got its webRequest API at a time it was trying to gain market share against Firefox (Sep 2011), where Adblock Plus, Ghostery, Disconnect, NoScript, and other such extensions were the most or among the most popular extensions on Firefox. The fact that they are planning to remove a proper blocking webRequest API with no word of an equivalent replacement is a sign of intent, that is, reducing the level of user agency in their user agent (aka Google Chrome). The details of what limitations we may put in the webRequest API are to be determined. As an alternative, we plan to provide a declarativeNetRequest API (see below). The non-blocking implementation of the webRequest API, which allows extensions to observe network requests, but not modify, redirect, or block them (and thus doesn't prevent Chrome from continuing to process the request) will not be discouraged. In Manifest V3, this API will be discouraged (and likely limited) in its blocking form. This can have a significant effect on every single network request, even those that are not modified, redirected, or blocked by the extension (since Chrome needs to dispatch the event to the extension to determine the result).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1f6d/e1f6d5b92de6d17b4382c91f0f6b68f4214c06f5" alt="ublock chrome extension ublock chrome extension"
This begins in the browser process, involves a process hop to the extension's renderer process, where the extension then performs arbitrary (and potentially very slow) JavaScript, and returns the result back to the browser process. The basic flow is that when a network request begins, Chrome sends information about it to interested extensions, and the extensions respond with which action to take. Currently, with the webRequest permission, an extension can delay a request for an arbitrary amount of time, since Chrome needs to wait for the result from the extension in order to continue processing the request. It is frequently used by content blockers.
#Ublock chrome extension how to
Hi,Is there any firewall certification or book study to know how to use it, implement policy, terms and best practices?More like a book study that could help to understand other brands will be usefull.The current webRequest API allows extensions to intercept network requests in order to modify, redirect, or block them.
#Ublock chrome extension free
I am not sure if any free tool is kept that up-to-date.
#Ublock chrome extension professional
To have a professional quality security assessment, you would need to scan for the latest vulnerabilities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffaa8/ffaa8b9af73132c0da5ac732d47563ecbb482cb6" alt="ublock chrome extension ublock chrome extension"
ExchangeOnline - Hide a group of users from eachother Cloud Computing & SaaS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60ba7/60ba71b2708f850b4978dd3caedad7e7a7ad2f13" alt="Ublock chrome extension"